![]() 10/11/2015 at 14:32 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
I’ve got a box of Pumpkin Spice Oreo’s until I eat them all, ask me anything you want.
![]() 10/11/2015 at 14:36 |
|
The “spice” part sounds a little much. How are they?
![]() 10/11/2015 at 14:36 |
|
Any difference between last year and this year’s batch?
![]() 10/11/2015 at 14:38 |
|
I didn’t have a chance to try the 2014 vintage, so I really can’t compare.
![]() 10/11/2015 at 14:39 |
|
More spice than pumpkin, just to be clear no pumpkins were harmed in the making of these cookies.
![]() 10/11/2015 at 14:40 |
|
Sounds right. IIRC, Starbucks’ pumpkin spice latte contains zero parts from anything that was once a pumpkin.
![]() 10/11/2015 at 14:44 |
|
We all know that the Carmel apple Oreo is the pinicle of Oreo technology. So with those being a 10, and those Oreos with minimal filling being a 1, where would you rank these?
![]() 10/11/2015 at 14:52 |
|
Oreo wouldn’t make the carmel apple cookie available for review until my October 13 visit to Target. I’d say overall this filling is about a 3.5 on a 1 to 10 scale, with chocolate filling being a 10. Other Oreo models that I feel are a better value and eating experience include Double Stuffed, and Triple Stuffed, both in classic white cream filling and chocolate fillings.
![]() 10/11/2015 at 15:04 |
|
Will it baby? :P
![]() 10/11/2015 at 15:59 |
|
![]() 10/11/2015 at 16:12 |
|
Have you turned into a white, suburban, soccer mom who drives a Lexus RX350?
![]() 10/11/2015 at 16:20 |
|
No it’s a Toyota Sienna.